Having a good time there, buddy?
of course. beer is awesome.
just need to keep working on those abs!
Shirtless Chord Overstreet appreciation post.
Via Polite Stranger
Follow me on twitter @CelebrityMeat
Via Show me your Teeth
Stephen Amell on Facebook : “Crossover” [x]
he knows how to work the fandom, that he does.
Grant Gustin and Stephen Amell. obviously i am now hooked on Arrow that I haven’t even caught up on Glee and White Collar! *horrors*
AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO DIES WHEN THIS HAPPENS?!
GOD DAMN YOU AMELL.
YOU LITTLE SHIT.
YOU LITTLE BASTARD.
EXCUSE ME WHILE I GO JUMP OFF OF A FUCKING CLIFF.
i die too. holy fucking hell.
Daniel Radcliffe ♥
looks sorta like James Franco here huh. how fitting for Kill Your Darlings.
OMG! This is SO sexy….Oliver almost shirtless and in leather! Whatever episode this is, it will be a drool-fest! Almost as good as the “Odyssey” episode, where Ollie was shirtless AND in leather pants (and unconsciuos!) for the most part of the present-day action.
I think he’s having some kind of hallucination.
Jacques Lacan reminds us, that in sex, each individual is to a large extent on their own, if I can put it that way. Naturally, the other’s body has to be mediated, but at the end of the day, the pleasure will be always your pleasure. Sex separates, doesn’t unite. The fact you are naked and pressing against the other is an image, an imaginary representation. What is real is that pleasure takes you a long way away, very far from the other. What is real is narcissistic, what binds is imaginary. So there is no such thing as a sexual relationship, concludes Lacan. His proposition shocked people since at the time everybody was talking about nothing else but “sexual relationships”. If there is no sexual relationship in sexuality, love is what fills
the absence of a sexual relationship.
Lacan doesn’t say that love is a disguise for sexual relationships; he says that sexual relationships don’t exist, that love is what comes to replace that non-relationship. That’s much more interesting. This idea leads him to say that in love the other tries to approach “the being of the other”. In love the individual goes beyond himself, beyond the narcissistic. In sex, you are really in a relationship with yourself via the mediation of the other. The other helps you to discover the reality of pleasure. In love, on the contrary the mediation of the other is enough in itself. Such is the nature of the amorous encounter: you go to take on the other, to make him or her exist with you, as he or she is. It is a much more profound conception of love than the entirely banal view that love is no more than an imaginary canvas painted over the reality of sex.
It does make sense..
(Source: lysenkoist)Via An Existential Life